your a clueless journalist! agger is worth alot more than lescott is!!!

That’s a bit questionable as Lescott certainly had the better season and performed better at the Euros (not that Agger was poor by any means). At the time, City were spending a lot of cash which allowed teams to increase their valuation of players. That isn’t the case at this point.

I think you need a new job – you havent got a clue. There are plenty of clubs looking for a top class CB and Agger is among the best. Forget 20mill he is worth a lot more than that.

Agger is worth £25m – £30m. No doubt about it. Naturally he’s a centre-half but his talent is such, he could play anywhere. A top, top player!

Agger is a considerably better player than Lescott, regardless of market values or the club’s situation.

He’s a scalable player who will be rampant at City!

 actually agger had a better euro’s.  he was one of the top center backs of the entire tournament.  watch more than just england games next time.

Agger is one of the best defenders there is, the only setback is his fitness. He is easily worth 20 million.

 To a club that pays £35m for ‘My Little Donkey’ Agger may be worth that sort of money but City would be daft to pay more than £18m or so

rubbish!.. so lescott had the better season just coz city won the league?? lescott made mistakes and didnt have 2 defend as much as agger, agger was solid all season! 10 times better thn lescott agger looks composed on the ball where as lescott looks dodgy everytime his on the ball and always looks like his gonna do something stupid!

agger should stay at us and only leave for a big club, not the plastics at abu dhabi fc

lescott got knee capped when he lived in birmingham and they still payed 20+ for him agger just has a dodgy back.

Fact is City paid £23m for Lescott, therefore Agger is worth more than that. He is a better defender than Lescott, and is offers more going forward too. If City come in with anything beyond £25m I’d sell him cause he has been injury prone. Or £15m and Adam Johnson could do?

He wants to win something in his career. This is his last chance to join a team capable of winning the Champions league, just like Liverpool used to in the good old days.

wed be daft to sell Agger

Ha ha he may be worth that if Liverpool were buying but for a normal club with money sense he is worth nowhere near that amount. Hilarious!

Agger played far fewer games and was injured again as per usual. Lescott was a key component to the team that won the league whereas Agger was a bit player for a team that finished 8th. Yeah, Lescott had the better season — that’s not really open for debate.

Don’t get me wrong, I’d love to have him — but the fact that City were willing to up their offer considerably to get Lescott is not indicative of what the team will do now.

You can’t base valuations off the past. City were in a buying mode at the time to build the club. The club has been built now and they won’t “overpay” at this point.

Agger may very well be worth more than 23m but it has nothing to do with what City paid for Lescott. That’s like saying ‘Pool paid 35m for Carroll so if they buy another English striker they should have to pay 40m. There is no direct correlation.

Its not about whether city were in buying mode! Its to do with the fact that Lescott isnt in the same league as Agger, listen stop beating around the bush with the Andy Carrol saga, the fact is based on pure quality a club that paid 23m for Lescott is now the club who want Agger so out of kompany, agger and lescott which two would most people choose at the back??!! the first two! so agger has to cost more if he goes…….and on a final note Agger shat on Lescott in the euros, he had to defend against much harder teams than Hodgsons shitty England did and he coped brilliantly.

Your clueless, utterly clueless, go find another article to disgrace with your lack of footballing knowledge, lescott worth 23m but agger worth only 18m?????? Av a day off son.

Danny should stay at Liverpool and see if Brendon Rogers can deliver. If he however feels he want to go, then we should ask £30m minimum. Based on the value utd payed for Ferdinand who was nowhere near as good as Danny is now. If city want him, then dig deep or do one.

Halloweenhead
Check your stats. Danny Agger got man of the match in 2 of the games denmark played. Lesscott is sh1t

Agger has never asked for this, only last week his agent stated Agger is happy at LFC and wants to sign another contract. If LFC sell him, then it’s their call not Daniel, he has always said he’d be happy to end his footballing life in LFC.

Injury record is a huge concern but a healthy Agger is one of the worlds best no question.

what an absolute waste of time article.

If lesscott is worth around £20mil then agger is worth more than that. However I would never pay that much for agger or lescott

did you see the teams that Agger faced. Germany, Holland and Portugal. Denmark isn’t the greatest team, yet they made these team sweat infront of goal. 

Dagger insists he wants to stay. But Buck Rodgers will sell for the right price. Imo if he leaves he should be sold to a foreign club. Not to our closest rivals.

Money sense? Which is why you bought Lescott for 23 million? Doesn’t sound like money sense to me

What about a club that paid 23m for “Planet of the Apes” aka Lescott? The only reason we paid 35m for Carroll is because we got 50m for Torres, had Torres had cost 35, then Carroll had cost 20.

Yes you are right, Agger was injured for a period of the season, that however does not make him a bit player, when he was fit, which was most of the season, he was a key player for us. And for the time he was fit, he was better and had a better season than Lescott did for all of the season. Kompany saved his bacon numerous times. Regardless of what position a team finished, he had a better season. Remember when Scott Parker was named player of the season, despite playing for a team that was relegated? My point exactly

the question really is is any player worth that amount of money, lets be honest its not like they are leading surgons where someones life depends on them. they are talented footballers thats it .how can anyone justify paying that amount for a player and also give them salaries that most of us would have to work 10 years to see 1 weeks of theirs, and God knows how many years a nurse would have to work to see that sort of money. dont get me wrong i support liverpool i just think all footballers and clubs must be living on another planet throwing and demanding money like that