Expert Opinion

mancini_oct25
25Oct

It’s time Mancini went back to basics

by Jonathan Wilson avatar

In the past six years, Roberto Mancini has won three Serie A titles and the Premier League. In terms of major championships collected during that period, only José Mourinho can equal him. It is a formidable record and, based on that alone, Mancini should be hailed as one of the greats of his generation.

Yet the suspicion lingers that he has just been fortunate, the right man in the right place at the right time. He took charge of Internazionale with the other big guns in Serie A weakened by the Italian match-fixing scandal. At Manchester City, he has had unprecedented resources. Look, his accusers say, at his record in the Champions League: in his first two seasons at Inter, Mancini’s side went out in the quarter-finals; in his next two, they went out in the last 16.

Last season, Mancini’s first in the Champions League with City, brought a group-stage exit. Then, it was possible to have sympathy for City. Uefa’s odd way of seeding sides gave them a tough group in which they accumulated 10 points – usually enough to qualify. This season they got another difficult group, being drawn with the champions of Spain, Germany and the Netherlands. Still, for the Premier League champions, a side assembled at such expense, to have taken a single point from their opening three games and to be left needing, by Mancini’s own admission, “a miracle” to qualify, seems to be more than misfortunate.

The real worry for City fans is that the poor form exposed in Europe is actually not just another example of Mancini’s now fabled poor Champions League record, but part of a wider blight. Amid the delirious drama of the final day of last season, it seemed impolite to ask how it had ever come to that. The assumption then was City, a first Premier League first now in the bank, would kick on. In fact the fear for neutrals was that they would dominate to a tedious extent.

That certainly hasn’t happened. If anything, City have gone backwards, frequently winning games this season because their high-class individuals have done something spectacular rather than because of a coherent structure or team plan. Against the likes of Southampton and QPR, even West Brom, that can be enough; against the champions of Spain, Germany and Holland, it isn’t.

Last season Mancini had a dynamic and tough team, one seasoned with exceptional and unpredictable individual forwards. This season he seems to be attempting to develop their style into something more possession-based. That explains the sale of Nigel de Jong, the way Joleon Lescott – whose partnership with Vincent Kompany was probably the best centre-back pairing in the Premier League last season – has fallen out of favour and the experimentation with a back three.

The question, really, is why? City had an effective way of playing; the Barcelona style may have been praised across the globe, but there is more than one way to play. A certain evolution is desirable, necessary even, but the concern must be that this is change for change’s sake, almost as though Mancini feels he must prove himself, that he must make clear that what City do is down to him and his genius and not just down to having lots of good players.

After the fortuitous draw against Borussia Dortmund, Mancini was clear: “I know what the problem is.” After the 3-1 defeat to Ajax, he was adamant: “I take full responsibility. I didn’t prepare properly for this game.”

Perhaps he is just trying to take the heat of his players – and if he is, that is laudable – but perhaps there is also an impulse to turn the spotlight on himself.

That might sound harsh, but there is evidence the players are becoming disgruntled. “It’s something we have not worked on a lot,” Micah Richards said after another tactical switch had failed to come off against Ajax. “That’s twice we have gone to a back five and conceded but the manager likes it. If we want to do well with it, we are going to have to work on it.”

It’s time, perhaps, to go back to basics, to stop overcomplicating things. If the results come, then Mancini will receive due praise.

Related articles:

Order your copy of the Life’s a Pitch anthology

Video: Arsenal want Zaha, Hummels to Man Utd, City eye Jovetic 

Mike Calvin: Hart is the natural long-term England captain, not Rooney

Video: “Aguero didn’t say that he wanted to leave Man City”

Video: Mancini’s “overly emotional responses to defeat” a concern

Read more of Jonathan’s top-class writing in The Blizzard, a printed and downloadable quarterly football publication that he edits. You can also follow Jonathan on Twitter @jonawils

Follow Life’s A Pitch on Twitter @BTLifesapitch

Watch Man City live on BT Vision:
Man City v Swansea, 5.30pm, 27 October, ESPN
Man City v Tottenham, 1pm, 11 November, Sky Sports 1

Don’t have BT Vision? Find out how to get it

Comments

Please leave your comments using the box below. Learn more

  • jolaa

    Spot on Wilson!

  • Yhor

    learn after big mistake you should not apply that tactic in Europe look at what happened to Italy during their final Euro 2012 with Spain. Italy conceded four goal which very bad for that system.

  • Michael

    really good article.

  • Pedro

    Only Mourinho can match? Mancini won two serie a titles in past six seasons plus 1 EPL, (mourinho has 3 lge titles, 1CL) meanwhile Ferguson won the league in 2007, 8, 9, 11, the champions lge in 2008…Surely you could have fact-checked your intro?

  • Anon

    Pedro below me has said it, but your opening sentence is incorrect.

    4 league titles and a Champions League win (along with 2 more appearances in the final) surely beats Mancini’s record.

BT is not responsible for any external content or links uploaded by users of the site. Nor does the presence of information or links about other parties' products or services confer any form of endorsement of another party's products or services by BT. Please show respect to other users and avoid bad language when posting